Foundations of Management, Vol. 9 (2017), ISSN 2080-7279
DOI: 10.1515/fman-2017-0010
123
MEASURING DIGITALIZATION KEY METRICS
Marcin KOTARBA
Warsaw University of Technology, Faculty of Management, Warsaw, Poland
e-mail: [email protected]
Abstract: The article covers an analysis of metrics used to measure digitalization activities. Five main
levels are analyzed moving from the metrics of the digital economy to society, industry, enterprise,
and clients. The study is based on leading public and commercial metrics used for the evaluation of the
digital progress. The similarities and differences between key performance indicators on each level are
discussed, forming a set of conclusions on the scope and maturity of various measurement systems
and potential improvement options.
Keywords: digitalization, digital metrics, digital key performance indicators (KPI), benchmarking, dig-
ital economy, digital society, digital industry, digital enterprise, digital client, digital investment.
1
Introduction
Widespread digitalization of organizations and their
business models is one of the strongest trends re-
shaping the global economy of today. The drive to
digitize processes is fuelled by a strong assumption
of achieving higher overall organizational perfor-
mance and building competitive advantages, equally
important for both survival and growth (Peppard, J.,
2016).
Efficiency improvements are expected across all
dimensions of the profit and loss statement: revenue
generation (new clients, new sales, higher cross-sell
ratio, and lower churn), improved costs (automated
processes, straight-through-processing, shorter pro-
cessing times), and better risk management (im-
proved scoring by using precise and timely data, less
operational issues, advanced risk modeling) (Fernán-
dez-Olano, et al., 2015; Rutkowsky, et al., 2015;
Gottlieb, Willmott, 2014; Desmet, et al, 2015).
According to the research of McKinsey, companies
investing in digital solutions are expecting to deliver
annual growth and cost efficiencies of 5–10%
or more in the next 3–5 years (Catlin, et al., 2015).
Digitalization benefits for the society1 are highly
expected by the governments.
1 The European Union aims to achieve benefits in (1) climate
change, through partnerships with emitting sectors; (2) managing
aging population, through eHealth and telemedicine systems
and services; (3). digitization of content, through European; and
(4) intelligent transport systems (European Commission, 2016).
The work of the European Commission embraces the
potential offered by the digitalization as assumed
in the Digital Agenda pillar of the Europe 2020 strat-
egy (European Commission, 2016).
The Digital Agenda asks for a stronger leveraging of
the potential of information and communication
technology (ICT) in order to foster innovation, eco-
nomic growth, and progress by focusing on:
achieving the digital single market,
enhancing interoperability and standards,
strengthening online trust and security,
promoting fast and ultra-fast Internet access
for all,
investing in research and innovation,
promoting digital literacy, skills, and inclusion.
Positive impacts of digitalization are already seen
in various industries, where digital leaders outper-
form their peers (Westerman, et al., 2012; World
Economic Forum, 2016).
The consolidation of digitalization benefits is also
clearly visible on the macroeconomic level, resulting
in job creation, innovation, and economic growth
(El-Darwicheet, et al., 2012), as well as increasing
the efficiency of public service and administration
(Deloitte Access Economics, 2015).
Expectation of benefits from digitalization sparks
a plethora of investments programs in private com-
panies (Weiss, Sachdeva, 2016; Caldo, et al., 2014)
or public organizations and governments (Digital
India, 2015). Flow of capital is also seen by the dy-
124
Marcin Kotarba
namic development of venture funding, especially
in the FinTech industry, where in 2015, the global
investment amounted to 19.1 billion USD, with con-
tinued strong inflows in 2016 (Miller and Wong,
2016).
As appealing as it may seem, digitalization is not
a sea free from navigational problems. Organizations
involved in digitalization face multiple issues related
mainly
the (Fernández-Olano, et al., 2015;
Gottlieb and Willmott, 2014):
to
1) prioritization of investments (needs exceed avail-
able funding), and
2) understanding the true value of digital (measura-
ble results and clarity of business cases).
For both issues, it is critical that for ex-ante and ex-
post implementation of digital solutions, a set of
metrics is developed and managed in order to evalu-
ate the tangible (or other) benefits and assure their
proper measurement. In this respect, the famous
words of R. Kaplan remain very valid: “what you
measure is what you get”(Kaplan and Norton, 1992).
This notion is reflected in the new perspective of the
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Devel-
opment (OECD) on the digital economy, with a new
measurement agenda and a call for new statistical
and reporting
OECD’s view is converted into the following goals:
tools (OECD Publishing, 2014).
improve the measurement of investments in ICT
and its link to macroeconomic performance,
define and measure skills needed for the digital
economy,
develop metrics to monitor issues of security,
privacy, and consumer protection,
promote the measurement of ICT for social goals
and the impact of the digital economy on the so-
ciety,
invest in comprehensive, high-quality data infra-
structure for measuring impacts,
build a statistical quality framework suited
to exploiting the Internet as a data source.
The view of OECD as a growth-oriented entity with
global reach can be easily projected downwards onto
the situation of individual industries and enterprises.
At the same time, digitalization measurement sys-
tems implemented by lowest-level organizations can
provide valuable upward feedback, showing how
atomic microeconomic results contribute to the over-
all macroeconomic development.
DIGITAL
METRICS
I
N
V
E
S
T
M
E
N
T
ROI
Payback
NPV
IRR
ECONOMY
SOCIETY
( citizen)
INDUSTRY
Connectivity
Human Capital Use of Internet
ICT Integration Digital Public Services
Making markets
Sourcing inputs
Publicité
Running enterprises
Fostering enablers
Smart Infrastructure
Internet Users
eGovernment
ICT Investments Cybercrime
Growth of the Internet Digital Technology
Web presence/activity
Mobility
Digital Spending (Assets/HR) Digital Asset Stock Digital transactions Work Digitization
Interaction between firms, customers and suppliers
Internal/External Business Processes
ENTERPRISE
Conversion funnel Digital Traffic Sources Opt In/Out
Cross-sell ratio
Campaign Performance
Social Media Performance Customer Engagement
Digital Revenues/Sales and Assets
CLIENT
(buyer/seller )
On-line Solution Usage
Digital Self -Service Ratio
Application World Performance
Performance of Client Generations an Microsegments
Evaluation of Online Experience
Figure 1. Digitalization dimensions and their primary metrics
(source: own work)
Measuring Digitalization Key Metrics
125
The purpose of this article is to look at what digitali-
zation metrics are defined and used by various par-
ticipants of the economy and what lessons or
improvement actions can be proposed to enhance
the digitalization measurement systems. The study is
based on literature sources and on-site research with
selected European universal banks.
The following levels of digitalization with samples
of relevant metrics are covered (Fig. 1).
2
Digital Economy Metrics
It is commonly viewed that the term “digital econo-
my” was introduced by Don Tapscott in his publica-
tion: The digital economy: promise and peril in the
age of networked intelligence (Tapscott, 1997).
The term “digital economy” describes an economic
system where the usage of ICTs is widely spread,
embracing the:
1) base infrastructure (e.g., high-speed Internet ac-
cess, computing power, security services),
2) e-business (business models with high utilization
of ICT for front- and back-office functions), and
3) eCommerce (usage of the ICT in business-to-
business (B2B), business-to-consumer (B2C), and
consumer-to-consumer (C2C) transactions.
2.1 Digital Density Index (DDI)
Oxford Economics and Accenture developed jointly
a Digital Density Index (DDI) measuring how digital
technologies impact the economic growth (Macchi,
et al., 2015).
The ultimate aim of DDI is to guide further invest-
ments of both the public and business community in
order to stimulate economic development. The DDI
contains 50 indicators grouped into 4 activity areas
and 18 groups of metrics (Table 1).
Table 1. Measurement framework of the Digital Density Index
(source: Macchi, et al., 2015)
Activity area
Description and metrics
1. Making
markets
Increasing digitalization of existing markets and creation of new digital markets.
Recognition that existing markets are becoming increasingly digital and new markets
are being created through digital means.
Metrics: Customer activity cycle
Interfirm collaboration
Digitally contestable markets2
2. Sourcing
inputs
Use of digital technologies to source and/or use factors of production.
Degree to which digital technologies change the lifecycle of sourcing these factors for
the business.
Metrics: Plant, property, equipment
Finance (capital, liquidity)
Labor
3. Running
Enterprises
Business use of digital technologies and activities to execute key business functions.
Metrics: Technology process
Strategy process
Business model
Innovation
Human capital/talent
Research and development (R&D) spending
2 Contestable market is a market where new entrants face costs similar to those of established firms and where, on leaving, firms are
able to recoup their capital costs, less depreciation. Consequently, it is not possible for established firms to earn above normal profit as
this will be eroded by the entry of new firms, or, alternatively, the mere threat of such new entry may be sufficient to ensure that estab-
lished firms set prices that yield them only a normal profit return. Collins Dictionary of Economics, 4th ed. Pass C., B. Lowes, B., Da-
vies, L. 2005.
126
Marcin Kotarba
Table 1. Measurement framework of the Digital Density Index, cont.
(source: Macchi, et al., 2015)
Activity area
Description and metrics
4. Fostering
enablers
Changes in institutional and socioeconomic environments to facilitate digitalization.
Metrics: Organizational flexibility
Government spending
Connectivity
Ease of business
Attitudes in society
Long-term regulatory outlook
The metrics are used to compose an overall score
(0–100) for activity areas reflecting the digital pro-
file of a country’s economy in a benchmark view
with other economies (Fig. 2):
Figure 2. Sample Digital Density Score of selected economies activity areas
(source: Macchi, et al., 2015)
A deep dive on the country level elaborates on the
country’s performance in each group of metrics. An
example of the “Fostering enablers Ease of busi-
ness” metric shows maturity levels and country per-
formance (Fig. 3).
Figure 3. Digital Density Scores of selected economies: detailed metrics for the “Fostering enablers”
(source: Macchi, et al., 2015)
Measuring Digitalization Key Metrics
127
2.2 Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI)
Within the framework of ”Europe 2020 Strategy”,
the European Commission introduced a performance
measurement system to track the evolution of the EU
member states in digital competitiveness (European
Commission, 2016).
The Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI) is
a composite index that contains five primary meas-
ure areas (Table 2).
Both the DDI and DESI reflect an attempt to capture
factors of high impact on the competitiveness
of local economies in the global (or internal EU)
context. The results of the benchmarking can be used
to study the best practices in use by the top perform-
ing digital economies, to be qualified for a potential
reuse in other geographies.
The DDI is strongly market/economy oriented, while
the DESI
includes a view on both economic
and social factors, such as human capital potential
and usage of ICT by the population. DESI provides
an important differentiation by analyzing the eGov-
ernment as a separate category and allowing
investment
the efficiency of public
to measure
in the digitalization.
Publicité
Table 2. Digital Economy and Society Index activities and metrics
(source: European Commission, 2016)
Activity area
Description and metrics
1. Connectivity
The deployment of broadband infrastructure and its quality. Access to fast
broadband-enabled services is a necessary condition for competitiveness.
Metrics:
1a Fixed Broadband
1a1 Fixed BB Coverage
1a2 Fixed BB Take-up (usage)
1b Mobile Broadband
1b1 Mobile BB Take-up
1b2 Spectrum
1c Speed
1c1 NGA Coverage (>24Mb/s)
1c2 Subscriptions to Fast BB
1d Affordability
1d1 Fixed BB Price
2. Human capital
Skills needed to take advantage of the possibilities offered by a digital society.
Such skills go from basic user skills that enable individuals to interact online
and consume digital goods and services to advanced skills that empower the work-
force to take advantage of technology for enhanced productivity and economic
growth.
Metrics:
2a Basic Skills and Usage
2a1 Internet Users
2a2 Basic Digital Skills
2b Advanced Skills and Development
2b1 ICT Specialists
2b2 STEM (science, technology, engineering, math) graduates
128
Marcin Kotarba
Table 2. Digital Economy and Society Index activities and metrics, cont.
(source: European Commission, 2016)
Activity area
Description and metrics
3. Use of Internet
Variety of activities performed by citizens already online.
Such activities range from consumption of online content to modern communication
activities or online shopping and banking.
Metrics: 3a Content
3a1 News
3a2 Music, Videos and Games
3a3 Video on Demand
3b Communication
3b1 Video Calls
3b2 Social Networks
3c Transactions
3c1 Banking
3c2 Shopping
4. Integration
Digitization of businesses and their exploitation of the online sales channel.
of information tech-
nology
By adopting digital technology, businesses can enhance efficiency, reduce costs,
and better engage customers, collaborators, and business partners.
Furthermore, the Internet as a sales outlet offers access to wider markets and poten-
tial for growth.
Metrics: 4a Business digitization
4a1 Electronic Information Sharing
4a2 RFID
4a3 Social Media
4a4 eInvoices
4a5 Cloud
4b eCommerce
4b1 SMEs Selling Online
4b2 eCommerce Turnover
4b3 Selling Online Cross-border
5. Digital public
Digitization of public services, focusing on eGovernment.
services
Modernization and digitization of public services can lead to efficiency gains for the
public administration, citizens, and businesses alike as well as to the delivery of
better services for the citizen.
Metrics: 5a eGovernment
5a1 eGovernment Users
5a2 Pre-filled Forms
5a3 Online Service Completion
5a4 Open Data
Measuring Digitalization Key Metrics
129
3
Digital Society Metrics
1) reviewing the current set of internationally com-
The digital society can be described as a society
in which the usage of ICT is common across demo-
graphic parameters of the population. Digital citizens
function in the digital economy using the available
digital public and commercial infrastructure for con-
ducting life activities.
The measurement of society digitalization is a part
of the DESI presented in the previous chapter.
A similar approach is reflected in the OECD’s digital
economy measurement system comprising “indica-
tors traditionally used to monitor the information
society” (Macchi, et al., 2015, p.3). In the context
of this paper, it is important to note that OECD aims
at (Macchi, et al., 2015):
parable ICT indicators,
2) exploiting the potential of existing official statis-
tics and experimenting with new metrics,
3) identification of data gaps, and
4) discussing
the data
infrastructure needed
to measure ICT diffusion and impacts, including
tools for analysis of large data sets.
The OECD digital metric system can be generally
mapped onto the DESI areas, providing additional
key performance indicators (KPIs) or more details
for the metrics already indicated in DESI. Proposed
mapping and important additional OECD metrics (vs
DESI) are shown in Table 3.
Table 3. Digital Economy and Society Index activities and metrics
(source: European Commission, 2016)
OECD activity area description and selected additional metrics versus DESI
1. Smart infrastructure (DESI: Connectivity):
availability of fiber optics,
average download speeds,
connectivity costs (outside of the primary broadband connection): ICT devices (e.g., laptop, tablet, desk-
top), ICT applications, people using smartphones.
2.
Internet users (DESI: Human capital):
number of activities performed online per person,
digital natives: age of first Internet access, Internet usage by students at school and outside,
usage of parental controls and Web filters,
ICTs in schools: Internet connectivity, computer use for practicing, drilling, mathematics, and foreign lan-
guages,
online course usage (e.g., word processor, spreadsheet, programming),
computer use at work (simple, advanced, no use),
people who believe that they have sufficient ICT skills to find new jobs.
3. The growth of the Internet (DESI: Use of Internet):
online purchase analytics (e.g., travel, music, books, food, ticketing),
usage per type of operation (e.g., e-mail, product information, news, social networks, eBanking, eGovern-
ment, eCommerce (buy and sell), gaming, audio, video, travel, accommodation, Web radio, Web TV, tele-
phone, software download, job search, medical services, content creation),
average Wikipedia views (fixed and mobile connectivity),
YouTube views of domestic content,
top Web sites by type (e.g., search engine, social network, media content, portal, reference/encyclopedia,
news, eCommerce, eBanking, blogging),
search for health information,
number of domestic Internet domains.
130
Marcin Kotarba
Table 3. Digital Economy and Society Index activities and metrics, cont.
(source: European Commission, 2016)
OECD activity area description and selected additional metrics versus DESI
4. Digital technology (DESI: Integration of the digital technology):`
trust in cross-border eCommerce,
number of applications considered “standard” on the mobile phones,
overall number of applications,
usage of data analytics and big data, data-mining-related scientific articles,
average data storage cost,
Publicité
innovation (R&D activity and intensity, innovative enterprises in ICT manufacturing and services, en-
gagement in in-house ICT manufacturing),
patents related to digitalization (ICT related, radicalness of patents, ICT industrial designs, and ICT trade-
marks),
labor productivity in ICT,
cost of genome sequencing,
security measures used for authorization and authentication (strong/weak, offsite backups, intrusion detec-
tion systems, tokens, biometrics),
number of ICT security issues,
acknowledging security issues changes to browser settings,
number of issues on client data protection.
5.
eGovernment services (DESI: Digital public services):
problems in using eGovernment services (technical issues with portals, outdated information, no support
for digital solutions).
6. Other metrics (not explicitly specified in DESI):
weight of the digital economy in the overall economy (measured by GDP, number and performance/size of
ICT companies, new entrants on the ICT market, global trade, gross exports),
ICT investments (capital inflows, investment as a percentage of GDP, value added of ICT, venture capital
investments),
digital IQ (graduates in ICT, researchers in ICT).
The DESI index is used by the EU members states
for the EU progress reporting and also as a base
framework for more detailed studies of digital devel-
opment on the country level. For example, in Poland,
the Ministry of Digital Affairs3 prepares a compre-
hensive report on the “information society” (Szy-
manek, 2015) by using DESI metrics as well as
additional KPIs that provide very important insights
(Table 4).
A study of DESI and OECD shows that both sets
of metrics are mutually supplementary: a number
of KPIs are shared, while other metrics are distinc-
tive per set. Also, there are differences in definitions
and attributes (analytical dimensions). Both DESI
and OECD cover several aspects of the digital econ-
omy and society, without clear borders between
these dimensions or their strict hierarchy. The digital
citizen is not evaluated separately, but rather as
a part of a larger category of “Internet users.”
3 Ministry of Digital Affairs Ministerstwo Cyfryzacji i Admi-
nistracji, http://mc.gov.pl
Measuring Digitalization Key Metrics
131
Table 4. Additional insights information society metrics in the Polish economy
(source: Szymanek, 2015)
Group of additional insights in the Polish information society reporting:
internet users new versus regular, Internet illiteracy, Internet skills versus computer skills, competencies
of “digital natives,”
cybercrime protection,
client considerations/fear while using digital solutions,
integration services offered by eGovernment (API, open platforms, reporting),
running of useful eGovernment Web sites/portals (with traffic justifying the investment),
enterprises with Web presence,
internet advertising versus Internet sales,
purchasing versus Internet sales,
ICT usage in public administration:
promoting ICT usage in public administration,
implementing ICT in public administration,
internal process digitalization in public administration,
external process digitalization in public administration,
level of user centricity in public administration ICT,
promotion of citizen and enterprise mobility.
4
Digital Industry Metrics
For the purpose of this paper, the term “digital indus-
try” is defined as the application of digitalization
in any type of industry. It is, therefore, not limited
to the ICT/new technology sector that produces digi-
tal solutions, but it covers all manufacturing or ser-
vice delivery where such digital solutions are used.
One of the most prominent examples of metrics that
are used to measure the digital state of industries is
proposed in the McKinsey Global Institute (MGI)
Industry Digitalization Index (Manyika, et al., 2015).
The index covers three groups of metrics:
1) assets,
2) usage, and
3) labor,
for which detailed KPIs are defined in Table 5.
Another example of a measurement system is the
Industry Digitalization Index (IDI), which is derived
from the data collected in the Eurostat databases
(Friedrich, et al., 2011). The IDI contains data on
company usage of the digital infrastructure, grouped
into four dimensions:
digital input (procurement process digitalization),
digital processing (internal and external process
integration, enterprise resource planning (ERP),
customer relationship management (CRM), inter-
nal data sharing, external electronic data ex-
change with business partners and the public
sector, upstream and downstream supply chain
management/SCM),
digital output (sale process digitalization),
infrastructure (level of advancement of the ICT
function in the industry, Internet connectivity).
In comparison to the economy and society metrics,
the methods used to diagnose the industries empha-
size the process component, with an internal and
external view.
Process digitalization is measured in conjunction
with the ICT system infrastructure, especially with
the usage of established, integrated solutions such
as the ERP or CRM.
132
Marcin Kotarba
Table 5. Metrics included in the MGI Industry Digitalization Index
(source: Manyika, et al., 2015, p.30)
Group
Detailed metrics
Assets
Digital spending:
hardware spending (share of total expenditures spent on ICT hardware, e.g., computers
and servers),
software spending (share of total expenditures spent on software, e.g., enterprise
resource planning (ERP) software),
telecommunications spending (share of total expenditures spent on telecommunications,
e.g., broadband access and mobile data services),
IT services spending (share of total expenditures spent on IT services, e.g., IT consulting
and IT architecture and implementation).
Digital asset stock:
hardware assets (share of total assets made up of ICT hardware, e.g., computers and
servers),
software assets (share of total assets made up of software, e.g., purchased software
licenses),
connected equipment (share of equipment embedded with digital connections, e.g., oil
rigs outfitted to transmit data on yield),
data storage (data stored per firm, measured in terabytes, for firms with at least 1,000
employees).
Transactions:
digital transactions (share of payments and transfers, both from consumers to businesses
(C2B) and from businesses to other businesses (B2B) made through digital means, e.g.,
payments via ACH or wire).
Interactions between firms, customers, and suppliers:
digital external communications (composite score based on share of firms reporting
benefits from using social technologies to interface with customers and share of firms
reporting benefits from using social technologies to work with partners),
digital customer service (composite score based on average number of customer service
chats per month and share of total contact center calls routed by automated systems, i.e.
integrated voice response (IVR) or automated speech recognition (ASR) technology).
Business processes conducted internally:
digitized back-office processes (composite score based on the adoption of enterprise re-
source planning (ERP) software (e.g., SAP, Oracle) across the industry, and share
of firms reporting that technology is very integrated into employees’ daily activities),
digitized front-office processes (composite score based on the adoption of customer re-
lationship management (CRM) software across the industry and digital marketing (e.g.,
e-mail, banner, and search engine advertisements) expenditures, as an estimated share
of total marketing expenditures),
product development software intensity (intensity of software usage in product devel-
opment process, e.g., for computer-assisted design).
Publicité
Usage
Measuring Digitalization Key Metrics
133
Table 5. Metrics included in the MGI Industry Digitalization Index, cont.
(source: Manyika, et al., 2015, p.30)
Group
Detailed metrics
Usage
Market making:
digitally enabled markets extent to which digital platforms are being used to connect
supply with demand, calibrated using the relative size of digital bid-ask or auction-based
markets (in terms of users, transactions, and/or revenues).
Labor
Digital spending:
hardware spending on workers’ ICT hardware, for example, computers and server
expenditures per full-time-equivalent employee (FTE),
software spending per worker, for example, enterprise software license expenditures
per FTE,
telecommunications spending per worker telecommunications (e.g., broadband access,
mobile data service) expenditures per FTE,
IT services spending per worker IT services (e.g., IT consulting and IT architecture
and implementation) expenditures per FTE.
Digital capital deepening:
hardware assets per worker ICT hardware assets (e.g., servers and computers)
per FTE,
software assets per worker software assets (e.g., worker software licenses) per FTE.
Digitization of work:
share of tasks that are digital (time-weighted share of worker tasks involving digital
tools or processes, e.g., tasks requiring workers to input information via tablet, conduct
online research, or perform analyses with spreadsheet software). Based on a search
for digital keywords (e.g., data, computer, software) in a publicly available database
of worker tasks,
share of jobs that are digital (digital jobs, e.g., computer and information systems man-
agers, hardware engineers, telecommunications equipment installers and repairers as
a share of total jobs).
5
Digital Enterprise Metrics
The level of a single enterprise digitalization can be
measured with industry metrics presented in the pre-
vious section. However, there is a large additional
measurement area that is not covered explicitly
by the IDI. Additional KPIs describe the status and
performance of eCommerce and digital customer
dialog in an enterprise. Core KPIs of this type in-
clude:
conversion funnel (users/visitors leads pro-
spects clients/wins) and cost (cost per lead/
prospect/client),
traffic sources (organic, paid search/affiliate net-
works/referrals, direct, e-mail, social media),
opt-in/out level and dynamics,
email/SMS performance(bounce/delivery
rate,
sharing, open rate, click-through-rate (CTR), cost
per lead (CPL), lead quality (LQ), and name
to marketing qualified lead (MQL) conversion),
public and eCommerce Web sites (bounce/drop-
off rate, page views per visit/total, ad cap-
ture/impressions, CTR,
cost-per-impression
(CPI), cost-per-click (CPC), new sessions, time
on (sub)-site, CPL, LQ),
134
Marcin Kotarba
content quality (white-book downloads, newslet-
ter/info-service sign-ups),
subscription service performance (free trial to
subscription rate),
social media volume and performance (sharing
and tagging, Facebook likes and lead conversion,
Twitter followers, promoted tweet cost/success,
YouTube subscribers, LinkedIn followers, Insta-
gram followers, Google+ circled-by, Pinterest
pinning),
media performance (social, digital and tradition-
al) number and quality of publications,
customer engagement (Client Satisfaction Index,
mystery shopper results, Net Promoter Score
(NPS), churn and retention levels),
campaign and digital channel return on invest-
ment (ROI) and revenue share in total,
client cross-sell ratio,
sales and revenue per digital client and revenue
share in total.
The presence of the above enterprise metrics in the
economy/society and industry measurement systems
is limited, despite their purely digital nature.
6
Digital Client Metrics
In the course of research on the topic of enterprise
digitalization metrics, the author collected infor-
mation on the practical application of digital KPIs
in sample financial institutions.
Banks are at the forefront of digital transformation,
engaging in highly competitive struggle internally
within the financial sector and externally with
FinTech/venture capital corporations as well as with
non-financial players making more bold attempts at
capturing financial services’ market share (e.g.,
Bitcoin/Blockchain, Apple Pay, Google Wallet).
From this point of view, digitalization is a key to the
survival and growth of current and future business
models on the banking market.
A case study, sourced via interviews with Chief Dig-
ital Officers and collection of KPIs, was conducted
on five universal banks operating in the European
Union (EU). The goal was to understand what KPIs
and dashboards were used for regular tracking of the
progress of digitalization.
In comparison to all the measurement systems pre-
sented already in the paper, the following conclu-
sions can be drawn from practices in the sample
banks:
a number of base metrics are in line with the
economy/society/industry/enterprise views, for
example, digital solution users (gross and net),
Web site activity tracking, and social media per-
formance,
there are several groups of KPIs specific to the
banking sector, for example,
usage of online solutions:
-
logins per day/month (time of day analysis,
session duration),
- number/volume of transactions per ses-
sion/in time series,
- customer login journey (origination pat-
terns),
- most frequently used functionalities,
- hardware technological platform used, with
change history (iOS, Android, Windows),
- software platform used (system, browser
type),
- origination IP for security tracking purpos-
es,
product sales(volumes), revenues, and profita-
bility of digital clients,
self-service ratio via digital solutions in sales
and after sales per product and channel,
business activity generated via the mobile
and stationary channels,
app-world performance (downloads of appli-
cations per platform, rankings/stars and feed-
back, application updates,
share of contact campaign records processed
via digital channels,
banks are highly detailed with respect to digital
performance in client segments via:
observance of client generations (e.g., Baby
Boomers, X, Y, Z),
microsegmentation into profiles (e.g., via digi-
tal activity preferences),
Measuring Digitalization Key Metrics
135
tracking of con...