KAIZEN
(Ky'zen)
i
FPT
KA1ZEN
The Key to Japan's Competitive Success
KAIZEN means gradual, unending improve-
ment, doing "little things" better; setting — and
achieving — ever-higher standards.
It is KAIZEN, says Masaaki Imai, that is the
simple truth behind Japan's economic "miracle"
and the real reason the Japanese have become the
masters of "flexible manufacturing" technology
— the ability to adapt manufacturing processes to
changing customer and market requirements, and
do it fast.
For the U.S. , KAIZEN 's clear message is "do
it better, make it better, improve it even if it ain't
broke, because if we don't, we can't compete
with those who do."
Now, for the first time, Western managers
have a comprehensive handbook of 16 KAIZEN
management practices they can put to work.
Using more than 100 examples of KAIZEN in
action, 15 corporate case studies, and 50 charts
and graphs, Mr. Imai examines step by step all the
roles KAIZEN plays in .
.
.
• Profit planning.
• Customer satisfaction.
• Total quality control programs.
• Suggestion systems.
• Small-group activities.
• Just-in-time production.
• Just-in-time information processing.
• Systems improvement.
• Cross-functional management.
• Policy implementation or "deployment!'
• Quality deployment
• Total productive maintenance.
• Supplier relations.
• Top management commitment.
• Corporate culture.
• Problem solving in such areas as labor- management
relations.
(Continued on back flap)
(Ky'zen)
The Key to Japan's Competitive Success
Digitized by the Internet Archive
in 2012
http://archive.org/details/kaizenOOmasa
(Ky'zen)
The Key to Japan's Competitive Success
MASAAKI IMAI
McGRAW-HILL PUBLISHING COMPANY
New York St. Louis San Francisco Auckland Bogota Caracas
Hamburg Lisbon London Madrid Mexico Milan Montreal
New Delhi Oklahoma City
Paris San Juan Sao Paulo
Singapore
Sydney Tokyo Toronto
First Edition
13
14
15
Copyright © 1986 by The KAIZEN Institute, Ltd. (KAIZEN is a trademark
of The KAIZEN Institute, Ltd.)
All rights reserved.
Printed in the United States of America. Except as permitted under
the United States Copyright Act of 1976, no part of this publication
may be reproduced or distributed in any form or by any means, or
stored in a data base or retrieval system, without the prior written
permission of the publisher. Distributed by McGraw-Hill, Inc.
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Imai, Masaaki, 1930-
Kaizen, the key to Japan's competitive success.
Includes index.
1. Industrial management— Japan.
2. Comparative
management.
HD70.J3I547
ISBN 0-07-554332-X
1986
I. Title.
658'. 00952
85-30015
.
Permissions
Acknowledgments
Grateful acknowledgment is made to the
following for permission to reprint previously published materials:
excerpt from an article by Jeremy Main, Fortune. April 2, 1984.
© 1984 Time Inc., All rights reserved.
excerpt from Quality Progress, October, 1983, copyright American
Society for Quality Control, Inc. reprinted by permission.
Portions of this book originally appeared in the Japan Economic
Journal (Nihon Keizai Shimbun) and When in Japan (Hotel Okura)
To Kenichi Nakaya, Professor Emeritus
of Tokyo University, who opened up new
horizons for me when I was a student.
Acknowledgments
I must admit that I cannot take credit for all
the ideas expressed in this book. I have merely brought together
the management philosophies, theories, and tools that have been
developed and used over the years in Japan. If I have contributed
anything, it is in organizing them under a single and readily under-
standable concept: KAIZEN.
In the course of writing this book, I have benefited from the help
of many businesspeople, experts, and academics, both in Japan and
abroad. Although I have tried to credit them by name in the text,
giving all the names each time would be impossible.
Particular thanks go to Musashi Institute of Technology presi-
dent Kaoru Ishikawa, one of the gurus of Total Quality Control
(TQC) in Japan, and former Toyota vice president Taiichi Ohno,
who initiated kamban and the "just-in-time" system. Ishikawa and
Ohno consistently supported the Cambridge Corporation's efforts
to explain KAIZEN to Western management and participated gener-
ously in the many seminars and workshops the Cambridge Corpora-
tion has held.
Other people who have provided assistance include professors
Masao Kogure and Yoji Akao of Tamagawa University; president
Masashi Nishimura and executive vice president Shuzo Moroto of
Aisin-Warner; president Naohiko Yagi of Japan Steel Works; execu-
tive managing director Kaisaku Asano of Kayaba Industry; presi-
dent Kenzo Sasaoka of Yokogawa-Hewlett-Packard, and president
Yotaro Kobayashi of Fuji Xerox.
IX
x
KA1ZEN
I have also benefited from the help of many executives actively
engaged in implementing company-wide QC in Japan, among them
Zenzaburo Katayama of Toyota; Zenji Shimada of Pentel; Hisashi
Takasu of Kobayashi Kose; Motomu Baba, Ken Yonekura, and Kaoru
Shimoyamada of Komatsu; Hidekazu Sadoya of Canon; Takeomi
Nagafuchi and Haruo Kamimoto of Ricoh; Kenji Watabe of Japan
Steel Works; and Yoshiki Iwata of Toyoda Gosei.
Beginning in 1957, I had the good fortune to start a five-year
stint at the Japan Productivity Center in Washington, D.C., studying
American management practices and helping to introduce them to
Japan. This experience gave me valuable insights into management
theory and practice and prepared me for a long and fruitful career
as a management consultant. The man who organized the Japan
Productivity Center 30 years ago and heads the organization as
chairman today is Kohei Goshi. Not only did I find him most sup-
portive during my formative years, I have enjoyed his continuing
tutorship since returning to Japan in 1961.
Various publications by such organizations as the Union of Japa-
nese Scientists and Engineers (JUSE), the Japan Productivity Center,
the Japan Standards Association, the Central Japan Quality Control
Association, and the Japan Management Association have been val-
uable resources for the writing of this book. In fact, I have often
felt overwhelmed by the enormous amount of information available
in Japan.
Others who assisted me in writing this book are Philips senior
consultant S. Subramanian; Dynamic Management International
director Ross Matheson; Japan Research president Fred Uleman;
John Powers of the Academy for Educational Development; Educa-
tional Systems and Designs vice president Emmett Wallace; and
Alberto Galgano, managing director of Alberto Galgano & Associ-
ate I must also thank Allan Austin and Robert Zenowich of Austin
& Lindberg, whose introduction to Random House made the pub-
lication of this book possible, as well as Patricia C. Haskell and
Paul S. Donnelly of Random House for seeing it through to fruition.
Individuals cited in the text are identified by the positions they
held at the time the interview took place or the quoted text was
written. Likewise, conversion into U.S. dollars is based on the
exchange rate prevailing at the time and is for reference only.
Last but not least, my thanks go to my secretary, Noriko Igarashi,
Acknowledgments
xi
who has consistently assisted me in searching out and putting
together the materials for the book, patiently typed, retyped, and
re-retyped the manuscript, and put in long hours above and beyond
the call of duty.
Yet despite my considerable debt to all of these people, it goes
without saying that none of them should be held in any way respon-
sible for my own inability to benefit fully from their assistance and
to make this a better book than it is.
Masaaki Imai
Contents
List of Illustrations
xv
Publicité
Glossary
xix
Foreword
xxvii
The KAIZEN Challenge
xxix
1
KAIZEN, The Concept 1
KAIZEN Values
KAIZEN and Management
Implications of QC for KAIZEN 8
KAIZEN and TQC 13
KAIZEN and the Suggestion System
KAIZEN and Competition
Process-Oriented Management vs.
Result-Oriented Management
16
16
5
14
2. Improvement East and West 23
KAIZEN vs. Innovation (1)
KAIZEN vs. Innovation (2)
KAIZEN and Measurement
23
31
38
3. KAIZEN by Total Quality Control
43
Quality Control Deals with the Quality of People
Japanese vs. Western Approaches to Quality Control
Follow the PDCA Cycle (A Continuation of the
60
Deming Wheel)
43
46
KAIZEN at the Grassroots Level
78
Xlll
xiv
Contents
4. KAIZEN-The Practice
81
Management-Oriented KAIZEN 82
KAIZEN in Facilities
Group-Oriented KAIZEN 94
Individual-Oriented KAIZEN
Suggestion Systems
110
111
84
5. KAIZEN Management 125
Cross-Functional Management
Policy Deployment
Quality Deployment
Total Productive Maintenance
153
142
727
158
6. The KAIZEN Approach to Problem Solving
163
163
The Problem in Management
KAIZEN and Labor-Management Relations
Management and Labor: Enemies or Allies?
The Productivity Culture
Productivity in Disarray: The Hard and the Soft Aspects
Top Management's Commitment
165
172
203
178
184
7. Changing the Corporate Culture 207
The Customer: The Ultimate Judge of Quality
211
Supplier Relations
Changing Corporate Culture: Challenge to the West
Summing Up
226
207
216
231
Appendix A 3-MU Checklist of KAIZEN Activities
Appendix B The Five-Step KAIZEN Movement
Appendix C The Five Ws and the One H 235
Appendix D The 4-M Checklist
Appendix E KAIZEN Problem-Solving Tools
Appendix F Deming Prizes
Appendix G KAIZEN Activities at Canon: A Case Study
239
237
233
243
Index
255
247
.
7
1
FIGURE 1.1
FIGURE 1.2
FIGURE 1.3
FIGURE 1.4
FIGURE 1.5
FIGURE 1.6
FIGURE 1.7
FIGURE 1.8
FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 2.2
FIGURE 2.3
FIGURE 2.4
FIGURE 2. 5
FIGURE 2.6
FIGURE 2.7
FIGURE 2.8
FIGURE 2.9
FIGURE 3.1
FIGURE 3.2
FIGURE 3.3
FIGURE 3.4
FIGURE 3.5
FIGURE 3.6
FIGURE 3.
FIGURE 3.8
FIGURE 3.9
FIGURE 3.10
FIGURE 3.11
FIGURE 3.12
List of Illustrations
4
The KAIZEN Umbrella
Japanese Perceptions of Job Functions (I)
Japanese Perceptions of Job Functions (2)
Western Perceptions of Job Functions
7
Innovation-Centered Job Functions
Hierarchy of KAIZEN Involvement
Deming Wheel
11
8
7
Process-Oriented (P) Criteria vs.
5
7
32
31
24
26
26
Result-Oriented (R) Criteria
18
Features of KAIZEN and Innovation
25
Ideal Pattern from Innovation
Actual Pattern from Innovation
Innovation Alone
Innovation plus KAIZEN 27
Total Manufacturing Chain
Another Comparison of Innovation and KAIZEN
Western and Japanese Product Perceptions
33
Upcoming Japanese Product Perceptions
Why Customers Had to Wait
What Makes Customers Wait
Check Sheet -Designed to Identify the Problems
Reasons Why Callers Had to Wait
Reasons Why Callers Had to Wait (Pareto Diagram)
Effects of QC (Comparison of Before and After QC)
Effects of QC (Pareto Diagram)
Correlation Between Deming Wheel and PDCA Cycle
Initial PDCA Cycle
Revised PDCA Cycle
Western PDCF Cycle
Interaction of PDCA and SDCA Cycles with
54
55
57
56
33
62
62
Publicité
61
56
KAIZEN and Maintenance
64
xv
56
57
60
xvi
List of Illustrations
FIGURE 3. 13
FIGURE 3.14
FIGURE 3.15
FIGURE 3.16
FIGURE 3.17
FIGURE 3.18
FIGURE 3. 19
FIGURE 3.20
FIGURE 4. 1
FIGURE 4.2
FIGURE 4.3
FIGURE 4.4
FIGURE 4.5
FIGURE 4.6
FIGURE 5.1
FIGURE 5.2
FIGURE 5.3
FIGURE 5.4
FIGURE 5.5
FIGURE 5. 6
67
Outline of Processes
Yield Graph of Resin Output for Reaction Tank A
Resin-Output Histogram
Cause-and-Effect Diagram
Analysis of Variation within Batch,
68
69
and Countermeasures
70-72
Resin-Yield Graph and *-R Control Chart
Output Histogram
73
73
76
Problem-Solving Cycle
Three Segments of KAIZEN
PDCA within the PDCA Cycle
95
Formal and Informal Structures for
81-82
Corporate Progress
98
Aisin-Warner Suggestion Form
Canon Suggestion Form (Simplified Form)
Canon Suggestion Form— Advanced Placement
116-117
121
(for Work Improvement)
122-123
129
KAIZEN-Managing vs. Maintenance-Managing
The QCS Wheel
Functional vs. Cross-Functional Matrix
Product Development in a Typical Company
Product Development at Ideal Company
List of Cross-Functional QA Activities for
130
132
131
67
126
FIGURE 5. 7
List of QA Activities at the Product-
Each Department
136-137
Planning Stage
138-139
FIGURE 5. 8
FIGURE 5. 9
FIGURE 5. 10
FIGURE 5. 11
FIGURE 5.12
Organization of TQC Activities at Komatsu
Ends/Means Chart for Policy Deployment
Use of Control Charts to Check Abnormalities
Control Points and Check Points
A Chart Showing Deployment of Quality Requirements
146
148
145
142
at JNR
156
FIGURE 6.1
FIGURE 6.2
Labor Response to KAIZEN Implementation
Outline of QA (Quality Assurance)
170
Implementation
187-189
FIGURE 6.3
FIGURE 6.4
FIGURE 6.5
FIGURE 6.6
FIGURE 6. 7
FIGURE 6.8
191
QC Training
Outline of Tools
Tool Utilization
Quality Assurance Systems Diagram
193
192
194-196
Quality Assurance Activity Table (Example)
197-199
Systems Diagram for Customer Complaint Processing
(Major Quality Problems)
200-201
List of Illustrations
XVII
FIGURE 7. /
FIGURE 7.2
FIGURE 7.3
Breakeven Point and Profit for Company A
Breakeven Point and Profit for Company B
Number of Customer Complaints at Kobayashi Kose
218
219
FIGURE 7.4
Production Cost at Kobayashi Kose After
After Introducing TQC 221
Introducing TQC 221
FIGURE G.I
FIGURE G.2
FIGURE G.3
FIGURE G.4
FIGURE G.5
CPS (Canon Production System) Structure Chart
Canon's Nine Waste Categories
249
248
Nine Wastes in Production
KAIZEN Project 100
250
List of Annual Awards Provided at Canon
250
252-253
Glossary
Definitions of key KAIZEN terminology
and concepts.
Analytical approach (to management improvement):
based on learning from the evaluation of past experience.
an approach
Autowomation (Jidohka):
a word coined to describe a feature of
the Toyota production system whereby a machine is designed to
stop automatically whenever a defective part is produced.
Check Points and Control Points:
both check points and control
points are used in measuring the progress of improvement-related
activities between different managerial levels. Check points represent
process-oriented criteria. Control points represent result-oriented
criteria. What is the check point to the manager becomes a control
point to the next-level manager. For this reason, check points and
control points are also used in policy deployment.
Cross-Functional Management: the interdepartmental coordina-
tion required to realize the policy goals of a KAIZEN and a Total
Quality Control program. After corporate strategy and planning are
determined, top management sets objectives for cross-functional
efforts that cut laterally throughout the organization.
Cross-functional management is the major organizational tool for
realizing TQC improvement goals. (While cross-functional manage-
ment may resemble certain Western managerial techniques, it is dis-
tinguished from them by an intensive focus on the follow-through
to achieve the success of goals and measures.)
XIX
.
xx
Glossary
Deming Cycle:
the concept of a continuously rotating wheel used
Publicité
by W. E. Deming to emphasize the necessity of constant interaction
among research, design, production, and sales so as to arrive at an
improved quality that satisfies customers (see PDCA Cycle).
Design Approach (to management improvement) :
tries to build a
better approach through predetermined goals. The design approach
should receive greater attention in future applications of the man-
agement process.
Five Management Objectives of Factory Management:
(see
Chapter 4). Five key points of factory management set forth by
Graham Spurling, Director of Mitsubishi Motors Australia.
Goals and Measures (in Japanese management):
(see Policy).
improvement as a part of a successful KAIZEN
Improvement:
strategy goes beyond the dictionary definition of the word. Improve-
ment is a mind-set inextricably linked to maintaining and improv-
ing standards. In a still broader sense, improvement can be defined
as KAIZEN and innovation, where a KAIZEN strategy maintains
and improves the working standard through small, gradual improve-
ments, and innovation calls forth radical improvements as a result of
large investments in technology and/or equipment.
A successful KAIZEN strategy clearly delineates responsibility for
maintaining standards to the worker, with management's role being
the improvement of standards. The Japanese perception of manage-
ment boils down to one precept: maintain and improve standards.
Jidohka:
(see Autonomation)
a production and inventory control technique that is
Just-in-Time:
part of the Toyota production system. It was designed and perfected
at Toyota by Taiichi Ohno specifically to cut waste in production.
KAIZEN: KAIZEN means improvement. Moreover it means con-
tinuing improvement in personal life, home life, social life, and work-
ing life. When applied to the workplace KAIZEN means continuing
improvement involving everyone — managers and workers alike.
Glossary
xxi
Kamban: a communication tool in the "just-in-time" production and
inventory control system developed by Taiichi Ohno at Toyota. A
kamban, or signboard, is attached to specific parts in the produc-
tion line signifying the delivery of a given quantity. When the parts
have all been used, the same sign is returned to its origin where it
becomes an order for more.
The kamban system is only one of many elements in a fully inte-
grated system of Total Quality Control and cannot be inserted into
a production process apart from these other TQC elements.
Maintenance:
maintenance refers to activities that are directed
to maintaining current technological, managerial, and operating
standards.
Manageable Margin:
the acceptable limits in a production proc-
ess. When the check points indicate that the process has exceeded
control limits, management must immediately determine the fac-
tors responsible and correct them.
There is a second phase to the manageable margin that is subtle
and somewhat more difficult to manage. When a production proc-
ess proceeds within the control limits but nonetheless establishes a
pattern, such a pattern may be the first indication of forthcoming
trouble and must be evaluated accordingly. Developing skills to
manage at this level of subtlety is the ultimate challenge to any man-
agement system.
PDCA Cycle:
The PDCA Cycle-plan, do, check, action-is an
adaptation of the Deming wheel. Where the Deming wheel stresses
the need for constant interaction among research, design, produc-
tion, and sales, the PDCA Cycle asserts that every managerial action
can be improved by careful application of the sequence: plan, do,
check, action (see also SDCA Cycle and Deming wheel).
in Japan the term is used to de-
Policy (in Japanese management):
scribe long- and medium-range management orientations as well as
annual goals or targets. Another aspect of policy is that it is com-
posed of both goals and measures, that is, both ends and means.
Goals are usually quantitative figures established by top manage-
ment, such as sales, profit, and market share targets. Measures, on
xxii
Glossary
the other hand, are the specific action programs to achieve these
goals. A goal that is not expressed in terms of such specific meas-
ures is merely a slogan. It is imperative that top management deter-
mine both the goals and the measures and then "deploy" them down
throughout the organization.
Policy Deployment:
the process of implementing the policies of a
KAIZEN program directly through line managers and indirectly
through cross-functional organization.
a technique to ensure maximum utilization
Policy Prioritization:
of resources at all levels of management in the process of policy
deployment. Top management's policy statement must be restated at
all management levels in increasingly specific and action-oriented
goals, eventually becoming precise quantitative values.
Process-Oriented Management: a style of management that is
also people oriented in contrast to one that is oriented solely toward
results. In process-oriented management a manager must support
and stimulate efforts to improve the way employees do their jobs.
Such a style of management calls for a long-term outlook and usu-
ally requires behavioral change.
Some criteria for meriting rewards in this style are: discipline,
time management, skill development, participation and involvement,
morale, and communication. In a KAIZEN strategy these criteria
are referred to as: P Criteria. KAIZEN strategy asserts that a con-
scious effort to establish a system which encourages P Criteria can
produce significant competitive advantages for the company.
QC (Quality Control):
according to the Japanese Industrial Stand-
ards (Z8101-1981) definition, quality control is a "system of means
to economically produce goods or services that satisfy customer
requirements."
When QC was first introduced to Japan by W. E. Deming in
1950, the main emphasis was on improving product quality by apply-
ing statistical tools in the production processes.
In 1954, J. M. Juran brought the concept of QC as a vital man-
agement tool for improving managerial performance. Today, QC is
used as a tool to build a system of continuing interaction among all
Glossary
xxiii
elements responsible for the conduct of a company's business so as
to achieve the improved quality that satisfies the customer's demand.
Thus, the term QC as used in Japan is almost synonymous with
KAIZEN, and although the use of statistics still remains the main-
stay of QC, it has come to add many other tools, such as New Seven
tools for improvement.
QC (Quality Control) Circles:
a small group that voluntarily per-
forms quality control activities within the workplace, carrying out
its work continuously as part of a company-wide program of qual-
ity control, self-development, mutual education, flow control, and
improvement within the workplace.
QCS (Quality, Cost, Scheduling):
in the construct of a hierarchy
of overall company goals as described by Shigeru Aoki, senior
managing director at Toyota Motors, the ultimate goal being "to
make profits ... is self-evident," ... the "next superordinate goal
. quality, cost, and scheduling (quantity and delivery).
should be .
. Therefore we should regard all other management functions
.
.
.
as existing to serve the three super-ordinate goals of QCS."
there is very little agreement on what constitutes quality.
Quality:
In its broadest sense, quality is anything that can be improved.
When speaking of "quality" one tends to think first in terms of prod-
uct quality. When discussed in the context of KAIZEN strategy
nothing could be further off the mark. The foremost concern here
is with the quality of people.
The three building blocks of a business are hardware, software, and
"humanware." Only after humanware is squarely in place should the
hardware and software aspects of a business be considered. Building
quality into people means helping them become KAIZEN conscious.
quality assurance means assuring
Quality Assurance (at Toyota):
that the quality of the product is satisfactory, reliable, and yet eco-
nomical for the customer.
a technique to deploy customer require-
Quality Deployment:
ments (known as "true quality characteristics") into designing char-
acteristics (known as "counterpart characteristics") and deploy them
xxiv
Glossary
into such subsystems as components, parts, and production proc-
esses. Quality deployment is regarded as the most significant devel-
opment to come out of TQC in the last thirty years in Japan.
Q Seven and the New Seven:
the seven statistical tools (com-
monly referred to as the Q Seven) and seven additional tools (the
New Seven) that have made an indispensable contribution to the
constant evolution and improvement of the Total Quality Control
movement. (See listing in Appendix E.)
Results-Oriented Management: this style of management is well
established in the West and emphasizes controls, performance,
results, rewards (usually financial), or the denial of rewards and
even penalties. Criteria, or R Criteria, are easily quantifiable and
short term. Western style management emphasizes R Criteria almost
exclusively.
SDCA Cycle (Standardize, Do, Check, Action):
a refinement of
the PDCA Cycle wherein management decides first to establish the
Publicité
standard before performing the regular PDCA function.
Seven-up Campaign:
a slogan for an improvement campaign
as part of a KAIZEN program at Nissan Motors in 1975 (see Chap-
ter 2).
Standardized Work:
combination of workers, machines, and materials.
as defined at Toyota this is the optimum
Standards:
a set of policies, rules, directives, and procedures
established by management for all major operations, which serves
as guidelines that enable all employees to perform their jobs
successfully.
Suggestion System:
in Japan the suggestion system is a highly
integrated part of individual-oriented KAIZEN. Its design is as
carefully plotted, implemented, and communicated as a company's
strategic plan. Scrupulous attention is paid to top management
responsiveness, and developing a system of feedback and rewards.
Japanese-style suggestion systems emphasize morale-boosting
Glossary
xxv
benefits and positive employee participation over the economic
and financial incentives that are stressed in the American-style
systems. (The dimension of Japanese suggestion systems is illus-
trated by the number of suggestions submitted annually. In 1985
Matushita was the Japanese company whose employees submitted
the highest number of suggestions. The total number of suggestions
exceeded 6 millionl)
TPM (Total Productive Maintenance):
total productive mainte-
nance aims at maximizing equipment effectiveness throughout the
entire life of the equipment. TPM involves everyone in all depart-
ments and at all levels; it motivates people for plant maintenance
through small-group and voluntary activities, and involves such
basic elements as developing a maintenance system, education in
basic housekeeping, problem-solving skills, and activities to achieve
zero breakdowns.
Top management must design a system that recognizes and re-
wards everyone's ability and responsibility for TPM.
TQC (Total Quality Control):
organized KAIZEN activities in-
volving everyone in a company— managers and workers — in a totally
integrated effort toward improving performance at every level. This
improved performance is directed toward satisfying such cross-
functional goals as quality, cost, scheduling, manpower develop-
ment, and new product development. It is assumed that these activi-
ties ultimately lead to increased customer satisfaction. (Also referred
to as CWQC- Company-Wide Quality Control.)
the Japan Productivity Center has a program
University of Labor:
for educating union executives in the sound concepts of business
management so that they can better negotiate with management.
Visible Management: the technique of providing information and
instruction about the elements of a job in a clearly visible manner
so that the worker can maximize his productivity. (The kamban, or
card, system is an example of this technique.)
a term in TQC that refers to things that are not
Warusa-kagen:
yet problems, but are still not quite right. Left untended they may
xxvi
Glossary
develop into serious problems. Warusa-kagen is often the starting
point of improvement activities. In the workplace, it is usually the
worker who notices warusa-kagen, and, hence, the worker becomes
the first echelon of maintenance and improvement.
Foreword
if we look back over the forty years follow-
ing the Second World War, we have seen Japan attain the status of a
world economic power, going through five phases of adaptation to
become a formidable competitor in various product areas. These
phases are:
Large-scale absorption of technology imported from the United
States and Europe
A productivity drive of hitherto unseen dimensions
A country-wide quality improvement programme inspired by the
ideas of Dr. Deming and Dr. Juran of the United States
A great degree of manufacturing flexibility, and finally
Multinational^
After successfully assimilating foreign technology and then achiev-
ing very high productivity and top quality, Japanese industries are
now focusing on flexible manufacturing technologies. This means
having the capability to adapt manufacturing in a very short time to
changing customer and market requirements. The key words are
mechanisation, automation, robotisation and related systems.
There are many interesting things which Western companies can
learn from the Japanese industrial environment. As you will read in
this book, Philips has introduced a Company-Wide Quality Improve-
ment programme. Like most Western companies, Philips has learnt
some lessons too. The programme we have instituted is directed
XXVll
xxviii
KAIZEN
towards "Total Improvement" and is not restricted to product qual-
ity alone. The aim is to improve everything Philips does.
Mr. Masaaki Imai, who participated in the initial stages of this
process in Philips, embraced the slogan and entitled his book
KAIZEN. From this angle he has reviewed the Japanese strategy of
the past three decades of improvements in productivity, quality and
flexibility. He does this with vivid examples and also looks at the
tools and systems used. As such, this book can also be most illumi-
nating for non-Japanese managers.
The world is going through a period of transition from frag-
mented markets to a more or less global one. Doing business in
such an environment calls for unique characteristics of multination-
ality. To survive in a highly competitive world, it is imperative for
multinationals to acquire the finesse which will enable them to
be identified with and integrate into the business environment or
country in which business is being done. However successful Japa-
nese companies have been up until now, the real challenge they con-
tinue to face lies in becoming truly multinational. Having spent six
years of my career in Japan, it became increasingly clear to me that
there is a problem area in doing business on a global scale which
the Japanese have not yet tackled properly, namely multinationality.
In their search for a model for the conduct of multinational busi-
ness, the Japanese would do well to study the Dutch example. Sharing
as these countries do, a relative smallness, the ability to adapt to the
cultures, as well as the business practices, of other countries becomes
a necessity. Such multinational behaviour has become second nature
to the Dutch and has been exemplified by Philips for nearly 100 years.
One must not be discouraged by cultural differences. Manufac-
turing is definitely a global activity and, as such, good practices,
wherever they come from, deserve our attention. However, Japa-
nese top management, especially in our branch of industry, has to
understand that one of the yardsticks used to measure their mana-
gerial qualities will be the degree to which they consider the world,
including their home country, Japan, to be their battleground. Reci-
procity is the key to our joint survival.
Dr. W. Dekker
Chairman of the Supervisory Board
N. V. Philips' Gloeilampenfabrieken
The KAIZEN Challenge
A.AIZEN strategy is the single most impor-
tant concept in Japanese management— the key to Japanese competi-
tive success. KAIZEN means improvement. In the context of this
book, KAIZEN means ongoing improvement involving everyone—
top management, managers, and workers. In Japan, many systems
have been developed to make management and workers KAIZEN-
conscious.
KAIZEN is everybody's business. The KAIZEN concept is cru-
cial to understanding the differences between the Japanese and
Western approaches to management. If asked to name the most
important difference between Japanese and Western management
concepts, I would unhesitatingly say, "Japanese KAIZEN and its
process-oriented way of thinking versus the West's innovation- and
results-oriented thinking."
KAIZEN is one of the most commonly used words in Japan. In
the newspapers and on radio and TV, we are bombarded daily with
statements by government officials and politicians regarding the
KAIZEN of our trade balance with the United States, the KAIZEN
of diplomatic relations with country X, and the KAIZEN of the
social welfare system. Both labor and management speak of the
KAIZEN of industrial relations.
In business, the concept of KAIZEN is so deeply ingrained in
the minds of both managers and workers that they often do not even
realize that they are thinking KAIZEN.
During the two decades preceding the oil crises, the world
XXIX
xxx
KAIZEN
economy enjoyed unprecedented growth and experienced insatiable
demand for new technologies and new products. It was a period in
which innovation strategy paid off handsomely. Innovation strategy
is technology driven and thrives on fast growth and high profit mar-
gins. It flourishes in a climate featuring:
Rapidly expanding markets
Consumers oriented more toward quantity rather than quality
Abundant and low-cost resources
A belief that success with innovative products could offset slug-
gish performance in traditional operations
Management more concerned with increasing sales than with
reducing costs
Those days are gone. The oil crises of the 1970s have radically and
irrevocably altered the international business environment. The
new situation is characterized by:
Sharp increases in the costs of material, energy, and labor
Overcapacity of production facilities
Increased competition among companies in saturated or dwin-
dling markets
Changing consumer values and more exacting quality requirements
A need to introduce new products more rapidly<...